What is a superforecaster? Who they are and how to become one
Superforecasters are the top forecasters from a US intelligence tournament. Who they are, what makes them accurate, and how to become one.
Read the articleWhat the Brier score and Brier skill score mean: the formula, worked examples, what counts as a good score, and a free calculator for your own forecasts.

The Brier score measures how good a probability forecast was. It is the squared difference between the probability you gave and what actually happened, averaged over all your forecasts. Lower is better: 0 is perfect, 0.25 is what you get by always saying 50%, and 1 is the worst possible.
It is also how you check any claim that AI can predict the future. It was introduced by the meteorologist Glenn W. Brier in 1950 to grade weather forecasts (Brier, 1950), and it is now the standard way to score forecasters, from weather services to AI superforecasters.
Try it: score your own forecasts with our free Brier score calculator. Paste probabilities and outcomes, and get your Brier score, skill score and a calibration check.
For a yes-or-no question, the Brier score of one forecast is:
Brier score = (forecast − outcome)²
For many forecasts, add up the scores and divide by the number of forecasts.
| You said | Did it happen? | Calculation | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90% | Yes | (0.9 − 1)² | 0.01 |
| 90% | No | (0.9 − 0)² | 0.81 |
| 70% | Yes | (0.7 − 1)² | 0.09 |
| 70% | No | (0.7 − 0)² | 0.49 |
| 50% | Either | (0.5 − 1)² or (0.5 − 0)² | 0.25 |
| 10% | No | (0.1 − 0)² | 0.01 |
Two patterns stand out:
Because the error is squared, a few overconfident misses can wreck an otherwise good record.
Say you made four forecasts:
Your Brier score is the average: (0.04 + 0.09 + 0.36 + 0.0025) ÷ 4 = 0.123. That is clearly better than the 0.25 you would get by saying 50% every time.
It depends heavily on how hard the questions are, but these rules of thumb help:
Never compare Brier scores across different question sets. Easy questions ("Will the sun rise tomorrow?") make everyone look brilliant. Only compare forecasters on the same questions.
The Brier score is a proper scoring rule: your expected score is best when you report exactly what you believe. If you think something is 70% likely, saying 90% to sound bold makes your expected score worse, and so does hedging down to 50%.
This is what makes it fair. It rewards honesty, not confidence and not caution. It is also why the score pairs so naturally with calibration: a forecaster who wants a good Brier score has every reason to make their probabilities mean what they say.
In 1973 Allan Murphy showed that the Brier score splits into three parts (Murphy, 1973):
A forecaster who always says the average rate can be perfectly calibrated and still useless, because they have no resolution. Good forecasters are calibrated and decisive when the evidence allows.
A raw Brier score is hard to judge on its own, because it depends on how hard the questions were. The Brier skill score (BSS) fixes that by comparing your score with a simple baseline on the same questions:
BSS = 1 − (your Brier score ÷ baseline Brier score)
The baseline is usually a strategy anyone could follow without skill, such as always forecasting the historical base rate (in weather forecasting this is called climatology), or always saying 50%.
How to read it:
Take the four forecasts above. Two of the four events happened, so a forecaster who always said 50% would score 0.25 on every question: a baseline Brier score of 0.25. Your score was 0.123, so:
BSS = 1 − (0.123 ÷ 0.25) = 0.51
You removed about half of the baseline's error. The Brier score calculator computes the skill score against the base rate, a coin flip or a prediction market for you.
For rare events, a low Brier score can flatter you. If an event happens 10% of the time, always forecasting 10% already scores 0.1 × 0.9 = 0.09. A forecaster with a Brier score of 0.08 looks excellent next to the 0.25 coin-flip line, but against the right baseline the skill score is only 1 − (0.08 ÷ 0.09) = 0.11. That is why serious comparisons report skill against a baseline, not raw Brier scores alone. It is also how AI forecasting benchmarks compare AI forecasters with humans and prediction markets; see AI vs. superforecasters.
Log loss is another proper scoring rule. It punishes confident misses even more severely: a 100% forecast that turns out wrong gets an infinite penalty. The Brier score is bounded, easier to explain, and more forgiving of a single disaster, which is why most forecasting tournaments use it.
Brier's 1950 paper summed the error over both possible outcomes, which gives a range of 0 to 2 for a yes-or-no question. Most forecasting work today uses the simpler version on this page, from 0 to 1. Rankings are the same; only the scale differs.
Lower. A Brier score of 0 means every forecast was perfect. Always forecasting 50% scores 0.25.
0.25. Saying 50% scores (0.5 − 1)² = 0.25 if the event happens and (0.5 − 0)² = 0.25 if it does not.
Anything above 0 beats the baseline, and 1 is perfect. There is no universal "good" value, because it depends on the questions and on which baseline you use, but on hard real-world questions even a modest positive score shows real skill. A negative score means the forecasts did worse than the baseline.
Calibration asks whether your 70% forecasts come true about 70% of the time. The Brier score measures overall accuracy and includes calibration as one of its three parts, together with resolution and uncertainty.