The Brier score, explained with examples
What the Brier score and Brier skill score mean: the formula, worked examples, what counts as a good score, and a free calculator for your own forecasts.
Read the articleSuperforecasters are the top forecasters from a US intelligence tournament. Who they are, what makes them accurate, and how to become one.

A superforecaster is someone whose forecasts of world events are consistently and measurably more accurate than other people's. The term comes from a four-year US intelligence tournament, where the best amateur forecasters, roughly the top 2%, beat professional intelligence analysts. Their secret was not genius or inside information. It was a set of habits anyone can learn, and that are now being built into AI.
In his 2005 book Expert Political Judgment, the psychologist Philip Tetlock showed that the long-range forecasts of many pundits and experts were often little better than chance. The obvious follow-up question: can anyone forecast well, and how?
In 2011, IARPA, the research arm of the US intelligence community, launched a forecasting tournament to find out. Over four years, 500 questions and more than a million forecasts, the Good Judgment Project, led by Tetlock and Barbara Mellers, won. Its best forecasters beat the other research teams by 35–72%, and according to Good Judgment they were more than 30% more accurate than intelligence analysts with access to classified information (Good Judgment). That top group became known as superforecasters.
Tetlock and Dan Gardner described the research in Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction (2015). The superforecasters were not a type of person so much as a way of working:
The book ends with "Ten Commandments for Aspiring Superforecasters" (summary). A few of the most useful:
You can practise every one of these habits:
Both pool information, in different ways: superforecasters by careful judgment, often in teams, and markets by letting people bet on their beliefs. Each can beat the other on different kinds of questions. Markets struggle with long shots and thin trading (how accurate are prediction markets?), while a small group of forecasters can miss news a market absorbs in minutes.
The superforecasters' habits are concrete enough to build into software, and in 2026 the best AI forecasting systems are close to them: statistically tied on one major benchmark and narrowly behind on another. We cover the evidence in AI vs. superforecasters and how such systems work in what is an AI superforecaster?
Sikt Intelligence is building an AI superforecaster: it reads the news and data that exist today, checks every source, and independent AI forecasters agree on one honest probability. Every forecast is graded, misses included.
A live AI forecast, scored in public. In the Sikt Midterm Bench, Sikt forecasts the 2026 midterms next to Kalshi and Polymarket. Latest round, Oct 3, 2026: Senate: Democrats 56% (markets 64% to 66%), every round; House: Democrats 88% (markets 91% to 92%), every round. Every forecast will be graded after election day, misses included.
A forecaster whose predictions of world events are consistently more accurate than others', measured with proper scoring rules over many questions. The term comes from the Good Judgment Project, which won a US intelligence forecasting tournament from 2011 to 2015.
Forecast many real questions in public, always as probabilities, start from base rates, update in small steps, and score yourself with the Brier score and a calibration check. Good Judgment Open and Metaculus are good places to start.
On many geopolitical questions, yes: Good Judgment's superforecasters were more than 30% more accurate than intelligence analysts with access to classified information.
Close. In 2026 the best AI systems are statistically tied with superforecasters on ForecastBench, while top human forecasters still lead narrowly on Metaculus.