How hedge funds and quant firms use prediction markets
Quant firms make markets on Kalshi, Wall Street buys Polymarket data as signals, and funds start hedging with event contracts. What institutions do in 2026.
Read the article69% of retail Polymarket accounts lose money, and 0.1% of accounts take 67% of the profits. Why most traders lose, and five habits of the ones who don't.

Most prediction market traders lose money. A study published on October 1, 2026 found that 69% of retail Polymarket accounts finished below break-even, and a Wall Street Journal analysis found that 0.1% of accounts take 67% of all profits. Prediction markets are not a casino where the house always wins; they reward the best-informed and most disciplined traders, and most traders are neither. Here is why the majority lose, and the habits that separate the few who don't.
| Source | Finding |
|---|---|
| Galaxy Research, October 2026 | 69.2% of 2.9 million retail Polymarket accounts finished below break-even, down $338.9 million combined |
| Wall Street Journal, May 2026 | More than 70% of Polymarket users lose money; 0.1% of accounts, fewer than 2,000, took 67% of profits, nearly $500 million |
| Wall Street Journal, May 2026 | On Kalshi, the average "yes" bettor loses 11% of what they wager, "worse than most Las Vegas slot machines" |
| Kalshi study, 2021–2025 | Buyers of contracts priced under 10¢ lost more than 60% of their money on average |
Sources: Galaxy Research via CryptoTimes, WSJ via CryptoTimes, Bürgi, Deng and Whelan.
The losses are usually small: the WSJ found that the typical Polymarket user is down between $1 and $100. But they are consistent, and the bottom 10% of traders lost an average of $4,000 each.
Galaxy separated "human-paced" accounts from high-frequency ones placing more than 50 orders per active day. The automated group was only 4.1% of accounts, but placed 80.8% of all orders and made about $246.8 million while retail lost $338.9 million. Quant trading firms such as Susquehanna, DRW and Jump Trading now run dedicated prediction-market desks (see how hedge funds and quant firms use prediction markets). When you buy, you are often buying from someone with better tools, faster data and a model.
A contract at 5¢ feels cheap: lose a nickel, maybe win a dollar. But cheap contracts win far less often than their price suggests. On Kalshi, buyers of contracts under 10¢ lost more than 60% of their money, while contracts priced above 50¢ earned small positive returns on average (Bürgi, Deng and Whelan). This is the favorite-longshot bias, and it is the single most expensive habit in prediction markets.
On Kalshi, trading fees are highest for contracts near 50¢, around 1.75¢ per contract (Covers), and every trade also pays the gap between buy and sell prices. If you think a 50¢ contract is worth 52¢, costs can erase the whole difference. We explain the math in prediction market odds, explained.
A market can be about something you care about: your team, your party, your favorite technology. Caring makes it harder to judge the odds coldly. A price is a probability, and the only question that matters is whether the true chance is higher or lower than that price.
Galaxy found that after a loss, 15.2% of accounts stopped trading for at least 30 days, compared with 6.1% after a win. Many traders leave right after the lesson, before they can learn from it.
And one surprise: specializing alone does not save you. Galaxy found 28.1% of specialists were profitable, against 30.4% of generalists, and sports specialists did worst, at 25.1%.
The evidence does not hand anyone a winning strategy. It does point to five habits that separate disciplined forecasters from gamblers:
Every habit above starts in the same place: an independent probability that is not just the market's price. Professional desks build that number in-house, with research teams and models. Most traders have only the price and a hunch.
Sikt Intelligence is building that second number for everyone. Our AI superforecaster researches each question from scratch, forms its own probability independently of the market, and shows it next to the market's price, so you can see at a glance where the evidence and the traders disagree. Every Sikt forecast is scored against what actually happens; our first public test is the Sikt Midterm Bench on the 2026 Senate races.
Sikt is in research. Join the waitlist for early access. Nothing here is financial or investment advice, and no tool, human or AI, removes the risk of losing money.
Yes. Galaxy Research found that 69.2% of 2.9 million retail Polymarket accounts finished below break-even, and a Wall Street Journal analysis found that more than 70% of users lose money, while 0.1% of accounts take 67% of profits.
Some traders do, but on average buyers lose: the Wall Street Journal found the average "yes" bettor loses 11% of what they wager, and research on Kalshi found that buyers of contracts under 10¢ lost more than 60%. Prices above 50¢ fared better on average.
Because they are overpriced. People overpay for small chances of big payouts, so cheap contracts win less often than their price implies. This is called the favorite-longshot bias.